<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home Zone Beta 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/</link>
	<description>metaquark blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Juan Cabanela</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Cabanela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=10#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I second this, I see greyed out text in the menu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second this, I see greyed out text in the menu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pal05</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>pal05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=10#comment-45</guid>
		<description>The most important feature for me would be the ability to act on ethernet ips or the mac adress of the gateway!
The most time i have wlan aviable but i don&#039;t use it cause i have a ethernet connection wich is a lot faster...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most important feature for me would be the ability to act on ethernet ips or the mac adress of the gateway!<br />
The most time i have wlan aviable but i don&#8217;t use it cause i have a ethernet connection wich is a lot faster&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=10#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Love the progress you&#039;ve made on this!  It&#039;s just a UI change, but if you allowed &quot;None of the following&quot; as an trigger option (e.g. for locking when none of your Airport networks are available), it might be less confusing for users.  As things stand, you have to understand that when you &quot;leave&quot; a network, it means that none of those are available.

Also, while at work and plugged into ethernet, I disable my Airport.  However, this automatically switches my location back to Automatic.  Can I make it distinguish between when my Airport is off and when it&#039;s simply not connected to my work networks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the progress you&#8217;ve made on this!  It&#8217;s just a UI change, but if you allowed &#8220;None of the following&#8221; as an trigger option (e.g. for locking when none of your Airport networks are available), it might be less confusing for users.  As things stand, you have to understand that when you &#8220;leave&#8221; a network, it means that none of those are available.</p>
<p>Also, while at work and plugged into ethernet, I disable my Airport.  However, this automatically switches my location back to Automatic.  Can I make it distinguish between when my Airport is off and when it&#8217;s simply not connected to my work networks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Witt</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Witt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=10#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Support for starting the screen saver immediately or running shell scripts or AppleScripts will be added soon, and I&#039;m currently working on more flexible Airport scanning (which will include an option to only recognise a network when you&#039;re connected to it). We&#039;re still in beta, so if you can think of other useful actions to include, let me know and I&#039;ll see what I can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Support for starting the screen saver immediately or running shell scripts or AppleScripts will be added soon, and I&#8217;m currently working on more flexible Airport scanning (which will include an option to only recognise a network when you&#8217;re connected to it). We&#8217;re still in beta, so if you can think of other useful actions to include, let me know and I&#8217;ll see what I can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=10#comment-42</guid>
		<description>This is a really good idea for a program, but you should put in more options for when the device leaves or returns (run script, turn on screensaver, etc.)...just a thought</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really good idea for a program, but you should put in more options for when the device leaves or returns (run script, turn on screensaver, etc.)&#8230;just a thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasilis</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasilis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=10#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I actually thought that Home Zone triggered actions when my computer connects to a certain network. That seems to make more sense to me, but I might miss something.
If I am connected to my neighbors open network I might want all my keychains locked. But Home Zone won&#039;t lock them because my own network is around. That is a little strange, isn&#039;t it?

But for the rest, it&#039;s an excellent app. Right what I need as a freelancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually thought that Home Zone triggered actions when my computer connects to a certain network. That seems to make more sense to me, but I might miss something.<br />
If I am connected to my neighbors open network I might want all my keychains locked. But Home Zone won&#8217;t lock them because my own network is around. That is a little strange, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>But for the rest, it&#8217;s an excellent app. Right what I need as a freelancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: generalmole</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>generalmole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=10#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Feature Request... So far I love where this cool new app is going.  One request though, would be to have it activate the screensaver when Bluetooth device leaves range, so you don&#039;t have to wait for the screensaver to come or manually activate.  
Thanks, keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feature Request&#8230; So far I love where this cool new app is going.  One request though, would be to have it activate the screensaver when Bluetooth device leaves range, so you don&#8217;t have to wait for the screensaver to come or manually activate.<br />
Thanks, keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Witt</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Witt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=10#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Currently not, but I&#039;ll try to switch this to a preference pane anyway so the status bar item won&#039;t be the main interface. Not sure how long this will take, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently not, but I&#8217;ll try to switch this to a preference pane anyway so the status bar item won&#8217;t be the main interface. Not sure how long this will take, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Witt</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Witt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=10#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Home Zone scans for available airport networks every 16 seconds (which corresponds to your approx. every 15th packet delay). What it does is the same as running 
$ /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Apple80211.framework/Versions/A/Resources/airport -s
or opening the wireless status bar item (which also takes a short moment, usually).

This seems to disrupt wireless traffic and is not desirable, that&#039;s right. I&#039;ll see what I can do... Running the above command with -S doesn&#039;t interrupt traffic, but doesn&#039;t give exact results as it also shows older networks, and only checking the network that you&#039;re connected to isn&#039;t very great, either. Maybe Home Zone can perform different types of scans with different intensities in a sensible manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Home Zone scans for available airport networks every 16 seconds (which corresponds to your approx. every 15th packet delay). What it does is the same as running<br />
$ /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Apple80211.framework/Versions/A/Resources/airport -s<br />
or opening the wireless status bar item (which also takes a short moment, usually).</p>
<p>This seems to disrupt wireless traffic and is not desirable, that&#8217;s right. I&#8217;ll see what I can do&#8230; Running the above command with -S doesn&#8217;t interrupt traffic, but doesn&#8217;t give exact results as it also shows older networks, and only checking the network that you&#8217;re connected to isn&#8217;t very great, either. Maybe Home Zone can perform different types of scans with different intensities in a sensible manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Pfetzing</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/02/11/home-zone-beta-4/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Pfetzing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=10#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Hi, I dunno whats wrong, but on my Core2Duo MacBook Pro HomeZone tends to kinda block my wireless lan.

When I ping my router, approx every 15th packet I get packet loss and ping times somewhere around 2000ms.

When quitting HomeZone, everything is fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I dunno whats wrong, but on my Core2Duo MacBook Pro HomeZone tends to kinda block my wireless lan.</p>
<p>When I ping my router, approx every 15th packet I get packet loss and ping times somewhere around 2000ms.</p>
<p>When quitting HomeZone, everything is fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
