<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aliases and what it means to AppFresh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/09/06/aliases-and-what-it-means-to-appfresh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/09/06/aliases-and-what-it-means-to-appfresh/</link>
	<description>metaquark blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michel</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/09/06/aliases-and-what-it-means-to-appfresh/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=36#comment-604</guid>
		<description>I think the major ones were : the MailScripts, Stuffit Deluxe, Missing Sync for (in my case) Palm OS. I don&#039;t know how you will implement the aliases and what they  but in the case of the MailScripts I don&#039;t think it will help too much as they have a different name... but they have the same version number! 

I think : 
- a search by version (ou release) number would be greatly welcome in AppFresh,
- a certain &quot;uniformity&quot; in the version number display would also be great because when you have a site (Macupdate or Version Tracker or other) that tells you :&quot;Program X is updated to version Y&quot; and AppFresh display is r(elease) Z, how can you be sure that you really have to update !?
-Another problem is that AppFresh doesn&#039;t seem to read again the version number when, after having done the update of a program, I ask it to check the update with the first item of the contextual menu! I have to quit (normally) AppFresh and restart it to &quot;see&quot; the update !

The advance grouping will be welcome as the  package creation !

Michel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the major ones were : the MailScripts, Stuffit Deluxe, Missing Sync for (in my case) Palm OS. I don&#8217;t know how you will implement the aliases and what they  but in the case of the MailScripts I don&#8217;t think it will help too much as they have a different name&#8230; but they have the same version number! </p>
<p>I think :<br />
- a search by version (ou release) number would be greatly welcome in AppFresh,<br />
- a certain &#8220;uniformity&#8221; in the version number display would also be great because when you have a site (Macupdate or Version Tracker or other) that tells you :&#8221;Program X is updated to version Y&#8221; and AppFresh display is r(elease) Z, how can you be sure that you really have to update !?<br />
-Another problem is that AppFresh doesn&#8217;t seem to read again the version number when, after having done the update of a program, I ask it to check the update with the first item of the contextual menu! I have to quit (normally) AppFresh and restart it to &#8220;see&#8221; the update !</p>
<p>The advance grouping will be welcome as the  package creation !</p>
<p>Michel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Winkler</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/09/06/aliases-and-what-it-means-to-appfresh/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Winkler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=36#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Which iusethis identifiers did you set manually? We should add aliases so you don&#039;t need to set those again.

Advanced grouping or creating packages is planed in one of the next versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which iusethis identifiers did you set manually? We should add aliases so you don&#8217;t need to set those again.</p>
<p>Advanced grouping or creating packages is planed in one of the next versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel</title>
		<link>http://metaquark.de/blog/2007/09/06/aliases-and-what-it-means-to-appfresh/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.metaquark.de/blog/?p=36#comment-602</guid>
		<description>Wow! I am the first to post !

Sorry to not have posted that before but I was working on some translations!

Here is the &quot;audit&quot; for the 0.5.3 version of AppFresh!

Before all :

Real Total of Apps : 491
Shown Total  (All) : 403
Updates : 7
UpToDate : 315
Unknown : 81

First step, changing IUseThis Identifier :
Real Total of Apps : 491
Shown Total  (All) : 403
Updates : 12
UpToDate : 346
Unknown : 45

Second step, after grouping apps :
Real Total of Apps : 491
Shown Total  (All) : 370 *
Updates : 3
UpToDate : 339
Unknown : 28

Ideally  :
I should only have 2 (real) updates because 2 of the 3 updates were linked to DivX as it&#039;s just possible to group in the same folder for the moment (I hope !). And for that one (and others), the wish is to have a &quot;free numbering&quot; .

And the number of Unknown apps would be only 18 if I could have the ability to group 2 apps on the Applications folder (they don&#039;t want to work on a subfolder), if I could have the ability to link plug-ins with apps, widgets with apps, a certain number of apps in a folder with a main apps (I am thinking of the Intego&#039;s apps where some apps are with VirusBarrier, some others with NetBarrier, and some other with (if I remember well) with NetUpdate) ! 

Where is the option to (un)filter known unsupported applications in the exclude part of the preferences ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I am the first to post !</p>
<p>Sorry to not have posted that before but I was working on some translations!</p>
<p>Here is the &#8220;audit&#8221; for the 0.5.3 version of AppFresh!</p>
<p>Before all :</p>
<p>Real Total of Apps : 491<br />
Shown Total  (All) : 403<br />
Updates : 7<br />
UpToDate : 315<br />
Unknown : 81</p>
<p>First step, changing IUseThis Identifier :<br />
Real Total of Apps : 491<br />
Shown Total  (All) : 403<br />
Updates : 12<br />
UpToDate : 346<br />
Unknown : 45</p>
<p>Second step, after grouping apps :<br />
Real Total of Apps : 491<br />
Shown Total  (All) : 370 *<br />
Updates : 3<br />
UpToDate : 339<br />
Unknown : 28</p>
<p>Ideally  :<br />
I should only have 2 (real) updates because 2 of the 3 updates were linked to DivX as it&#8217;s just possible to group in the same folder for the moment (I hope !). And for that one (and others), the wish is to have a &#8220;free numbering&#8221; .</p>
<p>And the number of Unknown apps would be only 18 if I could have the ability to group 2 apps on the Applications folder (they don&#8217;t want to work on a subfolder), if I could have the ability to link plug-ins with apps, widgets with apps, a certain number of apps in a folder with a main apps (I am thinking of the Intego&#8217;s apps where some apps are with VirusBarrier, some others with NetBarrier, and some other with (if I remember well) with NetUpdate) ! </p>
<p>Where is the option to (un)filter known unsupported applications in the exclude part of the preferences ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
